PDA

View Full Version : Have You Wondered Why the Media Isn't Covering the Slaughter in Russia?



MagicMtnDan
09-07-2004, 09:36 PM
Hurricane Frances. Bill Clinton's heart bypass. Hurricane Frances. Bill Clinton's operation. On and on it went this past weekend. And now today the media is repeating over and over a "grim milestone" of 1,000 dead soldiers in the Iraq war. That's not something to be glossed over or forgotten but what about the slaughter in Russia?!
If you've read any of the newspaper (or online) coverage you'll notice that little to no mention is made of the ethnicity of the "terrorists" who slaughtered HUNDREDS OF CHILDREN. The networks and newspapers all covered the Abu Gharaib prison scandal repeatedly for days and days. But when MUSLIM EXTREMIST (Islamo-fascists) TERRORISTS slaughter hundreds of children the media gives it a brief mention and then it's on to what Kerry said and blah, blah, blah.
Why doesn't the media cover it? It's simple really. If they give the slaugher of hundreds of innocent children, women and men the proper amount of coverage than John and Jane Doe in America will see more brutal evidence of the enemy that we're all facing. And they'll be reminded of how important our security really is. And then they'll come to the realization that there's really no choice when it comes to who to vote for. They know that George Bush is the only choice for President if you're concerned with your safety and the safety of your family.
If you don't realize that the media is horribly biased ask yourself what about the slaughter of these children in Russia. And ask yourself one more question, what if 9/11 happened and countries around the world didn't cover the story? What would you say then? What would you say about their motives? :mad:

steelcomp
09-07-2004, 09:49 PM
It's hard to believe that there are that many people in this country with their heads buried that far in the....well, where ever it is that they're buried. Every time I see a John Kerry sticker on a car, I just stare in amazement. I wnat to shout out at the top of my lungs, "what are you, STUPID!!!!?"
How many times have you heard the news report (now this is NATIONAL news, mind you) on the (female person) who called Kerry "hot!"? I heard it three or four times today. That's national news worthy? I'm so disappointed. :(

MagicMtnDan
09-07-2004, 10:14 PM
Did you hear that after Kerry loses the election he's going to get a job promoting the shampoo - "Really Big Head & Shoulders." :D

Rexone
09-08-2004, 12:14 AM
I think you hit that one right on the head Dan. In the liberal media's eyes the less attention directed towards terrorism right now the better for their preferred (weak ass I might add) candidate.
What's f'ed up is that if Kerry were to get elected and weaken our stance on defense and security and proactivity in the war we are in, every one of them is gonna take it right up the ass along with everyone else when the terrorists strike here in the US.
I firmly believe that we are in what could be called WW3 although no one will call it that (wouldn't want to alarm anyone). We have wide spread enemies of Islamic extremists throughout the world that would like nothing better than to nuke the US for no particular reason given the means to do so. The people that would have this weak excuse of a defender (Kerry) in office leading our country in this environment just amaze me too. It is like they have no brain. It's like me taking my wacker to Lake Ming and actually thinking and believing I'm gonna bring home a trophey in BGF. They are totally lame on their thinking on this "WAR WE ARE IN" HELLO you stupid ass Kerry sheep !!!!!!!!!!!!.
I guess because it doesn't feel like wartime here at home there is a level of complacency at work here. They attack Bush for life here at home that's pretty damn good for most. The same exact things that "insulate" us from that war. Focusing on their gay rights, welfare, economy, on and on... and ignoring the NUMBER ONE problem we face. The one problem that if not handled properly could end the US's existance as we know it. The problem that if not handled strongly and proactively NOW could make all those other issues moot points. I have some differences with the Bush admin on some issues (see sig for one) but there is not even a remote question in my mind who we need in command based on the choices running, to address the war and terror problems we and the world face.
ok I'm going back to work now that I've pissed myself off again on this subject. :hammer2:

HighRoller
09-08-2004, 04:44 AM
They won't cover it because over 30% of the terrorists in that Russian school were of Arab descent, obviously part of the same "rent-a-terrorist" group that we're fighting in Iraq. As usual, these murderous fascists have been kindly referred to as "Chechan rebels". Gimme a Fn break.

Blown 472
09-08-2004, 05:46 AM
They won't cover it because over 30% of the terrorists in that Russian school were of Arab descent, obviously part of the same "rent-a-terrorist" group that we're fighting in Iraq. As usual, these murderous fascists have been kindly referred to as "Chechan rebels". Gimme a Fn break.
What about when the soviets carpet bombed an entire city back in the 90's in chechnia?? did that get coverage? or the human rights abusues they did to them? where was that on prime time? there are two sides to the story and you are not hearing everything. Oh and didn't we get attacked under gw's watch? rabid dogs you are.

vdriver4ever
09-08-2004, 06:09 AM
I read an article some time back that liberals "tend to" look at their political stance as their religion. Since a fair amount of liberals "tend to" have very little faith. I guess this is why we can't understand their reasoning on some issues. Trying to understand a liberal is like trying to understand a person of faith from a religion very different from your own. Now before I get bombed with that statement certainly not all liberals are this way.
As far as the media. I pretty much stick to Fox. I can tell you that they have covered the Russian act pretty extensively. I refuse to watch some of the other news stations because they just make me too damn mad. I will make a prediction though....... Fox and some of it's programs are gaining daily on veiwer popularity. The other stations will soon be forced to become more fair and balanced in order to stay up in the ratings.

OGShocker
09-08-2004, 06:19 AM
Oh and didn't we get attacked under gw's watch? rabid dogs you are.
You still mad at GWB?
Glad you could stop by for a little name calling. Bbye.

Jeanyus
09-08-2004, 06:27 AM
I hadn't really noticed the lack of coverage, but I watch fox news and they had a segment abuot the Russiain massacre. But it is obvious that the liberal media does not want to do anything that might help Bush. It's really sad when you think about it. Some woman saying Kerry is hot (she must be blind) gets more coverage.
Have you ever noticed when you point a fact out to a liberal, they always counter with something like this, in my best whining voice " what about the carpet bombing? what about the abuses? what about the atrocities?"
What about when the soviets carpet bombed an entire city back in the 90's in chechnia?? did that get coverage? or the human rights abusues they did to them? where was that on prime time? there are two sides to the story and you are not hearing everything. Oh and didn't we get attacked under gw's watch? rabid dogs you are.
So what you are saying is, that the terrorists were justified, in taking over that school and killing all those kids. The old liberal 2 wrongs makes a right.
Talk about a rabid dog.
BTW the plot to attack the US, was hatched and planned, the poilots were trained, under Clintons watch. And of course Clinton was given the chance to take out Bin Laden, but he could not think of a reason to do it, or maybe he was to busy playing, bad president, with an inturn under his desk.

MagicMtnDan
09-08-2004, 06:31 AM
The other stations will soon be forced to become more fair and balanced in order to stay up in the ratings.
I want to believe this will happen (I want it to happen) but I can't. Did you notice that John Kerry's campaign just asked James Carville and I believe Paul Begala (two former Clinton campaing advisers) to help them out. Unbelievable thing is that BOTH of them are working at CNN (Communist News Network) at the same time as working for Kerry. And people wonder why we don't trust the media :o

Blown 472
09-08-2004, 06:34 AM
I hadn't really noticed the lack of coverage, but I watch fox news and they had a segment abuot the Russiain massacre. But it is obvious that the liberal media does not want to do anything that might help Bush. It's really sad when you think about it. Some woman saying Kerry is hot (she must be blind) gets more coverage.
Have you ever noticed when you point a fact out to a liberal, they always counter with something like this, in my best whining voice " what about the carpet bombing? what about the abuses? what about the atrocities?"
So what you are saying is, that the terrorists were justified, in taking over that school and killing all those kids. The old liberal 2 wrongs makes a right.
Talk about a rabid dog.
BTW the plot to attack the US, was hatched and planned, the poilots were trained, under Clintons watch. And of course Clinton was given the chance to take out Bin Laden, but he could not think of a reason to do it, or maybe he was to busy playing, bad president, with an inturn under his desk.
Where did I say that? I think it is chicken shit to **** with kids, Liberal?? get real.
Yes, but you have cheney saying that if kerry gets elected we will get attacked again, but yet it happened under gw's watch, strange.

MagicMtnDan
09-08-2004, 06:34 AM
What about when the soviets carpet bombed an entire city back in the 90's in chechnia?? did that get coverage? or the human rights abusues they did to them? where was that on prime time? there are two sides to the story and you are not hearing everything. Oh and didn't we get attacked under gw's watch? rabid dogs you are.
Hey Blown, you're too subtle for me :yuk: and I like how you describe yourself under your avatar: "Assclown troll" Bout sums it up sometimes :notam:

Blown 472
09-08-2004, 06:44 AM
Hey Blown, you're too subtle for me :yuk: and I like how you describe yourself under your avatar: "Assclown troll" Bout sums it up sometimes :notam:
Here you go, read all about it.
http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/russia/chechnya/

Jeanyus
09-08-2004, 06:48 AM
Where did I say that? I think it is chicken shit to **** with kids, Liberal?? get real.
Yes, but you have cheney saying that if kerry gets elected we will get attacked again, but yet it happened under gw's watch, strange.
If I was a terrorists I would think I would have a better chance for a succesful attack with Kerry as president than Bush. Plus the retribution is going to be less, and totally confused. Like when Clinton blew up an asperin factory after the Cole was attacked.

Dave C
09-08-2004, 07:49 AM
B72,
dude, you got all the rabid far left wing websites under your belt. ;) Talk about being off-balance.
I think we all know the Russians did some bad things but that doesn't justify this type of torture and slaughter of innocent women and children.
haven't we had this discussion before?

OGShocker
09-08-2004, 08:08 AM
http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/russia/chechnya/
Fair and balanced?... Are you still looking for work, or just a job?
When Bush re-ups will you move out of the US? I understand you can answer calls for Dell in India. :clover:

eliminatedsprinter
09-08-2004, 08:40 AM
What about when the soviets carpet bombed an entire city back in the 90's in chechnia?? did that get coverage? or the human rights abusues they did to them? where was that on prime time? there are two sides to the story and you are not hearing everything. Oh and didn't we get attacked under gw's watch? rabid dogs you are.
You have a point here.
The major media here has been weak on covering problems in Russia/Soviet Union for many years. Simply because Russia and the old Soviet union are and were leftist states and our left leaning media types don't like to cover problems involving the left.
P.S. There once was a legit independence movement in Chechnia, but that movement has been taken over by, Taliban like, islamafascists and Russia is in a very difficult position. They may have no choice but to brutally crush them.

HM
09-08-2004, 08:45 AM
Fair and balanced?... Are you still looking for work, or just a job?
When Bush re-ups will you move out of the US? I understand you can answer calls for Dell in India. :clover:
AmEx is also hiring in India. Tank you velly much. :rollside:
Blown is our special angry shut-in conspiracy guy that hates dyno's and gps and anything else that is fact based. Logic and reasoning also seem to be out to lunch on a regular basis, because anger has taken over the house. But, he can be funny as s h i t at times.
Now, if GW owned anything Mopar powered, Blown would be his biggest fan.

Blown 472
09-08-2004, 09:13 AM
AmEx is also hiring in India. Tank you velly much. :rollside:
Blown is our special angry shut-in conspiracy guy that hates dyno's and gps and anything else that is fact based. Logic and reasoning also seem to be out to lunch on a regular basis, because anger has taken over the house. But, he can be funny as s h i t at times.
Now, if GW owned anything Mopar powered, Blown would be his biggest fan.
Fact based? now that is some funny shit. When all the other builders in the country cant seem to make the kind of hp one guy can where are the facts in that? When you have people on here that listen to rush or whom ever and come spew that crap without having any back ground to it where are the facts? gw owned or kerry owned who cares they are scum bags that you guys ralley around and love to death and I just dont get it.

Blown 472
09-08-2004, 09:19 AM
Fair and balanced?... Are you still looking for work, or just a job?
When Bush re-ups will you move out of the US? I understand you can answer calls for Dell in India. :clover:
Got a job thanks. Here is some reading for you, maybe you should get out of the bubble you live in.
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040920&s=maharidge

BUSTI
09-08-2004, 10:00 AM
Thats politics! And although we like Bush and some like Kerry, including Blown, the issue can only be resolved at the ballot box. When Bush overwhelmingly kicks kerry's ass in November there will still be those that refuse to accept facts as truth. No matter what happens even in the next four years the war on terror is won by Bush, every single Arab dictatorship sucums to democracy started by Bush in the middle east, osama Bin Laden is captured, the economy is performing like a well oiled machined and lets say even the deficit was eliminated ................people like Blown and most of the Bush haters would still HATE the President and call him a scum bag for no other reason other than just because he is a Republican and for no other reason period!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Facts and rreason are to libs like Blown like Krytonite is to Superman............it kills them! :hammerhea

OGShocker
09-08-2004, 10:15 AM
Got a job thanks. Here is some reading for you, maybe you should get out of the bubble you live in.
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040920&s=maharidge
Dale Maharidge is a focking socialist! Is it no wonder you find his books and articles so outside my "bubble".
I like your blather better when you were posting under the name Lake Priate.

vdriver4ever
09-08-2004, 12:06 PM
Although I don't understand liberals at all I try not to pick on them. However have been so amused by HolyMoly's comments regarding liberals ability to ignore fact based information, that I thought it would be fun to start a list of items liberals don't believe.
You know your a liberal when you don't believe that 12" = 1 ft.
You know your a liberal when you don't believe the Americans deserved the most medals at the olympics this year.
You know your a liberal when you don't believe you were really born on the day your parents told you.
You know your a liberal when you don't believe the police officer when he said he clocked you at ten miles an hour over the speedlimit.
I got to go now I have some liberal friends I have to use some of these on.
You know your a republican when your favorite line is:
JUST THE FACTS MAM.......

MagicMtnDan
09-08-2004, 12:12 PM
I like your blather better when you were posting under the name Lake Priate.
Blown! Was that you posting as Lake Pirate? :sqeyes:

Blown 472
09-08-2004, 01:05 PM
Thats politics! And although we like Bush and some like Kerry, including Blown, the issue can only be resolved at the ballot box. When Bush overwhelmingly kicks kerry's ass in November there will still be those that refuse to accept facts as truth. No matter what happens even in the next four years the war on terror is won by Bush, every single Arab dictatorship sucums to democracy started by Bush in the middle east, osama Bin Laden is captured, the economy is performing like a well oiled machined and lets say even the deficit was eliminated ................people like Blown and most of the Bush haters would still HATE the President and call him a scum bag for no other reason other than just because he is a Republican and for no other reason period!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Facts and rreason are to libs like Blown like Krytonite is to Superman............it kills them! :hammerhea
Please I have a republican card. sheesh.
Ok, Busti since no one else can answer this question perhaps you can, since 15 of the 19 are from Saudi KNOW FACT hows come we are not attacking them? and since their gubment pays for the skools that they are taught this shit KNOW FACT how come we are not attacking them? and since there is a direct link to 9/11 to them KNOW FACT, how come no missles??

OGShocker
09-08-2004, 01:24 PM
Mother Russia is PISSED! (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040908/D84VN9AO0.html)

Dave C
09-08-2004, 03:34 PM
they may hold saudi passports but the government of Saudi Arabia does not sanction or harbor terrorism. Well not in public at least.
Besides the Saudis have arrested "token" terrorists for us.
I know what your going to say..... they are back dooring us... well maybe but thats their story and they are sticking too it. Besides their help is probably greater than their harm.
Please I have a republican card. sheesh.
Ok, Busti since no one else can answer this question perhaps you can, since 15 of the 19 are from Saudi KNOW FACT hows come we are not attacking them? and since their gubment pays for the skools that they are taught this shit KNOW FACT how come we are not attacking them? and since there is a direct link to 9/11 to them KNOW FACT, how come no missles??

78Eliminator
09-08-2004, 08:14 PM
When it comes to politics, try not to jump to the safety of your side: Republican or Democrat. Be intelligent and listen to all sides. Draw your own conclusions. Read periodicals and newspapers of countries involved. Try to cut through the shit and form your own opinion. Be intelligent. When you wave the "Republican" or "Democrat" flag, you are just telling the world, the intelligent and objective world, that you are ignorant.

HM
09-08-2004, 08:28 PM
When it comes to politics, try not to jump to the safety of your side: Republican or Democrat. Be intelligent and listen to all sides. Draw your own conclusions. Read periodicals and newspapers of countries involved. Try to cut through the shit and form your own opinion. Be intelligent. When you wave the "Republican" or "Democrat" flag, you are just telling the world, the intelligent and objective world, that you are ignorant.
When it comes to Democrat vs Republican, I do not listen to both sides as I view them as philosophies. I have values that I don't have to "listen" to another side to figure out what I believe: I believe in less government, less taxes, more personal responsibilities with consequences regardless of intent. I don't blindly follow the republican party, because they often drift from the base philosophies. Infact, half the time I think the libertarian party is starting to more closely match true conservative values, and the republicans are becoming democrats, and the dems are socialists. But, I will take a republican over a dem any day - as it is the base philosophy I vote for, not necesarily the candidate.
This is something the youngsters today seem to miss - having values and standing up for them regardless of what the media tells you. Oh, you must hear both sides to make a fair decision. Fock the fair decisions morons, life isn't fair. Get over it. Get a back bone and stand up for what you believe in and what is right.....not fair.

steelcomp
09-08-2004, 08:40 PM
Fact based? now that is some funny shit. When all the other builders in the country cant seem to make the kind of hp one guy can where are the facts in that? When you have people on here that listen to rush or whom ever and come spew that crap without having any back ground to it where are the facts? gw owned or kerry owned who cares they are scum bags that you guys ralley around and love to death and I just dont get it.
Typical. SO typical.

steelcomp
09-08-2004, 08:49 PM
When you wave the "Republican" or "Democrat" flag, you are just telling the world, the intelligent and objective world, that you are ignorant.
__________________
Give Common Sense a Chance.
Elim...you realy need to explain that one for it to even come close to common sense, or making sense. Are you saying that, because I choose to agree with the principals of one party over another, which are as different as night and day, and that I have come to that conclusion after many years of watching, learning, and listening to them both, seeing the effect each has had on our country, listening to the issues and weighing carefully each's response, both in rhetoric and action, that I have come to my decision without objectivity and that I'm ignorant because of it?
Is that what you're saying? To each and every one of us?

steelcomp
09-08-2004, 09:08 PM
This is something the youngsters today seem to miss - having values and standing up for them regardless of what the media tells you. Oh, you must hear both sides to make a fair decision. Fock the fair decisions morons, life isn't fair. Get over it. Get a back bone and stand up for what you believe in and what is right.....not fair.
This is because the children today are a product of forty years of a liberalised america, and they emerge from our public school systems which are nothing more than liberal indoctrination centers. The communists infiltrated our college campuses during the Vietnam war instilling socialist agendas into the minds of young college kids who were emotionally vulnerable because of the war, and seeking sympathizers, and since then, have found a very welcoming home in both our college campuses and our publlic schools. Think I'm wrong? Look back at the Vietnam era and find the root of every major (and minor) war protest, and who was behind it and who funded the organization. Where did they all eminate? College campuses. The money behind even the most recent war protests can be traced to communist interests. Why do you think college communities are generally so liberal? Look at most of the major colleges. The percentage of liberal professors to conservative is astonishingly in favor of the libs. Where are some of the most outrageous assaults on our constitution being implemented? Our schools. Have you looked at a public school curriculum lately? It's absurd!! It's one place that's out of hand, completely, and we just keep throwing money at it. AFAIC, it's one of the MAJOR roots of the problem in this country, and the whole education system should be scrapped, and start over. JMO

HM
09-09-2004, 08:50 AM
This is because the children today are a product of forty years of a liberalised america, and they emerge from our public school systems which are nothing more than liberal indoctrination centers. The communists infiltrated our college campuses during the Vietnam war instilling socialist agendas into the minds of young college kids who were emotionally vulnerable because of the war, and seeking sympathizers, and since then, have found a very welcoming home in both our college campuses and our publlic schools. Think I'm wrong? Look back at the Vietnam era and find the root of every major (and minor) war protest, and who was behind it and who funded the organization. Where did they all eminate? College campuses. The money behind even the most recent war protests can be traced to communist interests. Why do you think college communities are generally so liberal? Look at most of the major colleges. The percentage of liberal professors to conservative is astonishingly in favor of the libs. Where are some of the most outrageous assaults on our constitution being implemented? Our schools. Have you looked at a public school curriculum lately? It's absurd!! It's one place that's out of hand, completely, and we just keep throwing money at it. AFAIC, it's one of the MAJOR roots of the problem in this country, and the whole education system should be scrapped, and start over. JMO
Wow, a conspiracy we can both agree on!! The libs truly benefit from the lack of education going on in our school systems while promoting their liberal/socialist ideals. Re-writing history, deleting history, and creating class envy are way too prevalent in schools. By keeping people uneducated, they convince them to not worry and vote for them and they will take care of you and protect you from the evil mean republicans who want you to actually be responsible and accountable for your actions - how barbarian!! :rollside:

Blown 472
09-10-2004, 10:21 AM
[IWhere are some of the most outrageous assaults on our constitution being implemented? JMO
Humm and the current gubment going to libraries to find out what books I check out is not a violation of my right of privacy?? :idea: :idea:

Havasu Cig
09-10-2004, 12:49 PM
Humm and the current gubment going to libraries to find out what books I check out is not a violation of my right of privacy?? :idea: :idea:
It's has never happened, and even if they wanted to they still need a warrant. Don't believe everything you see on the news.

Dave C
09-10-2004, 03:46 PM
so you saying this actually happened to you?
conspiracy theorists of the world unite. ;)
Humm and the current gubment going to libraries to find out what books I check out is not a violation of my right of privacy?? :idea: :idea:

steelcomp
09-10-2004, 08:58 PM
Humm and the current gubment going to libraries to find out what books I check out is not a violation of my right of privacy?? :idea: :idea:
Um, I think it's called a PUBLIC llibrary! :messedup: