View Full Version : rpm air gap
keithmenard
06-20-2005, 10:47 AM
just wondering how many people are running this intake...what you think of it...would you get the polished version...and where you bought it from...thanks!
76ANTHONY
06-20-2005, 11:00 AM
WHAT ARE YOU RUNNING IT ON? I RUN ONE ON A 73 CAMARO WITH 355 AND A BARRY GRANT, ITS THE BOMB. HUGE DIFFERENCE :D
keithmenard
06-20-2005, 11:32 AM
468 twin turbo in my boat. I need to get a new intake because my old one is round port :(
I really liked the Air Gap on my last engine and sure wish I went with it this time too. On the last boat/engine, it gained about 200 rpms with the Air Gap over the Torker and about the same over the Performer 2/0.
ANY&ALL
06-20-2005, 01:40 PM
just moved up from the torker to the air gap love it great intake running an 850 king demon on top running 5500 rpms turning an A impeller
bighead
06-20-2005, 01:48 PM
Are you running the RPM or just the performer???
EXTREMEBOATS
06-20-2005, 05:15 PM
:D I've used the Air Gap on small and big blocks and IMO have allways gained something. The cooler the intake charge the better...Mike :hammer2:
SmokinLowriderSS
06-20-2005, 05:43 PM
Running the Performer RPM Air Gap on my 454. Love it. I'm only spinning an "A" at 4700 without the N2O but it works great. Rebuilt/cammed my 454 this winter for some more power ( about 400) but new loader seems to have evened it out. :supp: She sure runs hard.
Brooski
06-20-2005, 09:38 PM
Running the RPM air gap on my 468 and love it. Great power, and when cruising it doesnt suck toooo much fuel. I didnt get the polished one, but wish I would have now. :cry:
RCB19
06-20-2005, 10:22 PM
I used the RPM manifold on a couple of motors and they work great for a mild performance motor. If you are running a forced induction setup (turbos) I think you would benefit much more with an open plenum type manifold like the Victor or Victor Jr. The need and effects of a dual plane manifold kind of become useless in a forced induction situation.
HammerDown
06-21-2005, 05:04 AM
I would belive the "air gap" intake would make more sense on a engine with a cover or hood over it. As in a auto...can't see any advantage having it on a open engine boat.
I would belive the "air gap" intake would make more sense on a engine with a cover or hood over it. As in a auto...can't see any advantage having it on a open engine boat.
until you see the condensation on the runners after a WOT run. I had never seen that before on the runners, on the spacer yes, but not the runners. The Air Gap works real well and as I said earlier, I should've gone with it instead of the single plain Team G.
Speaking of which, anyone interested in a Team G open plenum? I went with this intake due to it having a larger plenum than the Victor Jr. It works real good on the top end.
mile2885
06-23-2005, 08:46 PM
What cam are you guys running with this manifold? Carb? I have a a stock bottom end (2bolt 454) and am looking to upgrade intake/cam IF you guys thing my bottom end can handle it...stock bore, cast pistions ect. My new heads are on the way......looking for an upgrade from the performer 2-0. Any hints?? :idea:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.