Jetmugg
07-11-2005, 09:06 AM
I know I've seen some discussion of this topic before, and there seems to be more than 1 school of thought on the topic of droop/wedge installation. The recommendation that I have recieved from more than 1 "West Coast" source seems to make the most sense to me. That is, wedging the droop down in back (lowering the thrust line) will result in more lift in the hull. I can understand this logic and can visualize the forces at work to create the lift. The lower thrust line, in combination with a Place Diverter to create the correct nozzle angle, effectively creates a "moment" rotational force which causes the front of the boat to lift, creating less water drag = faster boat.
However, I just got off the phone with one of the "Midwest" jetboat shops who recommended exactly the opposite. This guy I talked to was not the owner of the shop. He insisted that installing the wedge with the "fat part down" will result in a faster boat. I cannot visualize how raising the thrust line will result in a faster boat. Perhaps with a long straight "Snoot" and no PD, I can see how the angle of thrust results in more lift and more speed.
However, I have a Berkeley droop and believe that I need to wedge it "down" to optimize the lift and speed. What do the rest of you do? The hull in question is an 18' Gullwing.
SteveM.
However, I just got off the phone with one of the "Midwest" jetboat shops who recommended exactly the opposite. This guy I talked to was not the owner of the shop. He insisted that installing the wedge with the "fat part down" will result in a faster boat. I cannot visualize how raising the thrust line will result in a faster boat. Perhaps with a long straight "Snoot" and no PD, I can see how the angle of thrust results in more lift and more speed.
However, I have a Berkeley droop and believe that I need to wedge it "down" to optimize the lift and speed. What do the rest of you do? The hull in question is an 18' Gullwing.
SteveM.