32sunrkt
06-25-2007, 08:23 AM
THIS JUDGE SHOULD BE RECALLED FOR ABSUING THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
- R32
Judge Rules in Favor of Dry Cleaner in $54 Million Lawsuit Over Lost Pants
Monday, June 25, 2007
WASHINGTON A judge ruled Monday in favor of a dry cleaner that was sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants.
The owners of Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act by failing to live up to Roy L. Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign that was once placed in the store window, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled.
Bartnoff ordered Pearson to pay the court costs of defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung.
- R32
Judge Rules in Favor of Dry Cleaner in $54 Million Lawsuit Over Lost Pants
Monday, June 25, 2007
WASHINGTON A judge ruled Monday in favor of a dry cleaner that was sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants.
The owners of Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act by failing to live up to Roy L. Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign that was once placed in the store window, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled.
Bartnoff ordered Pearson to pay the court costs of defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung.