PDA

View Full Version : CIA and military terrorist organizations...



bigq
09-29-2007, 09:52 AM
If you lived in Iran and saw what they have claimed form inside Iran would you not see it this way? Would you consider the USA a terrorist state?
The big difference to me is we were provoked as a nation and have helped more nations with military and humanitarian aid then any country in history. I don't doubt that the CIA has done some questionable actions, but terrorist?
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran's parliament on Saturday approved a nonbinding resolution labeling the CIA and the U.S. Army "terrorist organizations," in apparent response to a Senate resolution seeking to give a similar designation to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
The hard-line dominated parliament cited U.S. involvement in dropping nuclear bombs in Japan in World War II, using depleted uranium munitions in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq, supporting the killings of Palestinians by Israel, bombing and killing Iraqi civilians, and torturing terror suspects in prisons.
"The aggressor U.S. Army and the Central Intelligence Agency are terrorists and also nurture terror," said a statement by the 215 lawmakers who signed the resolution at an open session of the Iranian parliament. The session was broadcast live on state-run radio.
The resolution, which is seen as a diplomatic offensive against the U.S., urges Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government to treat the two as terrorist organizations. It also paves the way for the resolution to become legislation that—if ratified by the country's hardline constitutional watchdog—would become law.
The government is expected to wait for U.S. reaction before making its decision. In Washington, the White House declined to comment Saturday.
On Wednesday, the Senate voted 76-22 in favor of a resolution urging the State Department to designate Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization. While the proposal attracted overwhelming bipartisan support, a small group of Democrats said they feared labeling the state-sponsored organization a terrorist group could be interpreted as a congressional authorization of military force in Iran.
The Bush administration had already been considering whether to blacklist an elite unit within the Revolutionary Guard, subjecting part of the vast military operation to financial sanctions.
The U.S. legislative push came a day after Ahmadinejad told world leaders at the U.N. General Assembly that his country would defy attempts to impose new sanctions by "arrogant powers" seeking to curb its nuclear program, accusing them of lying and imposing illegal penalties on his country.
He said the nuclear issue was now "closed" as a political issue and Iran would pursue the monitoring of its nuclear program "through its appropriate legal path," the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog.
Tensions between the U.S. and Iran have escalated over Washington accusations that Iran is secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons and has been supplying Shiite militias in Iraq with deadly weapons used to kill U.S. troops. Iran denies both of the allegations.

asch
09-29-2007, 01:15 PM
I believe something bad is a brewin'. Iran's been hiding it's "peaceful" nuclear program for what? If it's truly for peaceful means then why don't let people in to see what's going on. Ulterior motives are at work here, I'm tellin y'all. Then that little jerk is invited here only to dodge any meaningful questions lodged at him and the whole time he's talking about "peacful" desires and such. BAH! I ain't buyin it. Then he goes home and the US is suddenly a "terrorist state". Right about the time everyone's squaking peace and more peace is right about the time people start get killed.
As the song goes"
"I see the bad moon arising."
"I see trouble on the way."

centerhill condor
09-29-2007, 03:52 PM
There isn't anything "suddenly" about the situation..and yes, there is a bad moon a risin'.
Current estimates are 70% of US casualties are Persian supplied, etc. Our President has given great lip service regarding consequences. But, as yet they haven't materialized.
Weapons, particularly IEDs, are seized at the border...My gut tells me they could energetically disassemble it transit. Arrests are made...
With such little time left, the Bush administration will have difficulty forming a frontal assault. The europeans haven't made much progress and nobody takes the threat seriously under the blinding light of the 24 hour news cycle.
The Persians will overplay their hand and things will not work out well for them...the question is how many American troops will be injured and killed in the meantime.
Too bad Blown isn't on the forum...he usually has some Iraeli insider info regarding the causes of such strife.
At least you won't have to, "run through the jungle".
CC

bigq
09-29-2007, 05:02 PM
I believe something bad is a brewin'. Iran's been hiding it's "peaceful" nuclear program for what? If it's truly for peaceful means then why don't let people in to see what's going on.
Good question same could be asked as to why Saddam did not let inspectors in? He might still be hanging around if he had.