There have been a few threads discussing this topic... if you do a search some of them are pretty in-depth. Also, OldRigger and SpectraBrent are both pretty good resources.
Here's what I know: Bud Baily designed most of the boats for Campbell. He eventually left and started designing boats for Spectra. After Spectra he ended up Hallett. That's why the Spectra looks like a Campbell, and the 30' and 34' Halletts look like a 32' Spectra.
As for bottom design, the Campbell is MUCH flatter than a Spectra or any of the other makes. They don't ride very good, and they handle like a giant flatty. Not bad necessarily, just not as smooth as a more modern design.
The Spectra was splashed like crazy. I believe the Howard is an exact copy, and the DiMarco is the identical hull with a slightly modified deck. The Schiada is its own design, with a deeper V and a low-profile deck.
Some of the biggest differences are in rigging. Obviously Schiadas have always been first class. Campbells are built like tanks (four TALL full-length stringers, lots of glass), which is why they last forever, but they tend to be heavy and some of the early boats had pretty low-tech setups. My boat had a 12-degree strut, the motor all the way at the back, and little mini-cav plates. We fixed all that and it runs great now. From what I understand, some of the later Spectras didn't have full-length stringers. Don't know much about Howards, but I hear they're well-made.
Unless you're really interested in the Campbell history and mystique, I'd say it really just comes down to personal preference. I love my boat. The only thing I'd ever consider trading it for is a Schiada. Hope this helps.
-Dan