Reply With Quotei didn't wanna wear out my palm palms but yeah,thats whats really going on.stay away from the blown deals if you want it insured.
Saw two 224 Stokers rollin Topak last weekend when we were out. Running about 45mph high, dry and smooth. One had a sweet looking blown deal in it! I will look into the Stoker
i didn't wanna wear out my palm palms but yeah,thats whats really going on.
Is there a web site for Stoker? BTW went to Eliminator on Sun. and checked the 22 Daytona. It is being completely re-tooled. Top to bottom. From what I saw, :rollside: a mini 27 Daytona with half canopies and all. Looks like about 6-7" more freeboard as well, over the previous 22! I couldnt tell if it was going to get a inner linner or not. And two maybe three little steps in the bottom. I think it is the same guy that designed the big 40' cruiser and some of the others, behind the new design. 525hp=90mph+
HEY MACHINE HEAD BITE ME :yuk:
I think a 115mph Daytona is in my future and RMS will be sucking wake!
i'd check on ins. first and then have rms suck wake. good luck,lol.
Is it really going to be that bad. Is there any hp/mph/lenth/hull type equations from ins. companies. Like 79mph tunnel good, 81mph bad or 499 hp 22 tunnel good 501hp bad! Where are the breaks. This will determine the wake suckage.
When insuring a 21 Daytona, the threshold was 300hp with most Co's.
Seriously, if you're buying the the 21-24 cat range, just prepare to bend over. It's just part of the game.
26' cats and bigger seem to be insurable for a steep price. tunnels under 26 with any real power and your stuck.
check your pm's by the way.
How would a Stoker walk over snotty water compared to a 23' WPM, 22 Daytona, etc? I own a 23' WPM and love the straight line performance, but it turns like a cat. Not a negative toward the WPM hull, but more just the nature of the beast. Just looking for some real world experience if someone has some to offer! I know the Stokers corner like they are on rails!!
Craig
Posting Permissions