Reply With QuoteNo, just ones that talk to the prez on a weekly basis and lead there "flock" to help him. Rock on cock sucking tweeker :crossx:
So, you were privy to "weekly" phone calls? What evidence of THAT do you have?
Are you trying to say that a meth addict, who is a gay prostitute, and failed a lie detector test, has no credibility ?
Gay Prostitute, Meth Addict, Liar, who has an ax to grind in opposition to a person who does not support gay marriage.
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm Yes, VERY "credibility-challenged".
Can you picture the look on the face of an attorney about to depose him in a court? Sharks that swim don't smile that big.
No, just ones that talk to the prez on a weekly basis and lead there "flock" to help him. Rock on cock sucking tweeker :crossx:
So, you were privy to "weekly" phone calls? What evidence of THAT do you have?
Now Blown, in another thread you disputed deaths because no one was in the morgue to witness the bodies. Based on this philosophy, were you present to witness the cock sucking?????????
The dude admitted to it, no one has admitted to killing anyone.
The dude admitted to it, no one has admitted to killing anyone.
Sorry, by your own logic, if you weren't there, admissions ain't worth squat. Only the Mark-1 eyeball with personal experience is acceptable to you.
So you are 1st-hand privy to the cok-suking?
Sorry, by your own logic, if you weren't there, admissions ain't worth squat. Only the Mark-1 eyeball with personal experience is acceptable to you.
So you are 1st-hand privy to the cok-suking?
Blown was the "fluffer".
Blown was the "fluffer".
That explains a lot. :idea:
Now if blown would just have admited that in the first place, he'd have had eyewitness credibility and nobody can argue with that.
Posting Permissions