Reply With Quotedurka durka? baka durka jihad abdul?
j/k hi robwelcome to the p.c. pussified united states.
GATORADE IS NOT THE PROBLEM!
Toiletries don't commit acts of terrorism, Muslims do...
So why can't I take my toothpaste on the plane? How is it that Gatorade is
forbidden? Why can't I have a bottle of water?
Because we aren't really fighting a war with terror, we are losing a
struggle with political correctness. It is not so much the evil of
outsiders, it is the cowardice of politically correct Americans and
politically correct American politicians.
The cowardice that won't let us call a spade a spade, the makes us all live
in an alternate reality, that puts survival secondary to servility. We are
fighting World War III with one arm tied behind our back.
Last week was a good example.
A group of two or three dozen Muslims in England and Pakistan plotted to
blow up 10 or 12 passenger-laden airliners in transatlantic flight. The
purpose was to celebrate and reprise the attacks of September 11. The means
was the detonation of explosive liquids disguised as common liquids - like
Gatorade or shampoo.
The plot was discovered, followed and - hopefully - foiled by British
intelligence with an assist from Americans and Pakistanis. Immediately, new
restrictions were put on airline passengers. Because the plotters planned
to use liquids, passengers were forbidden to bring liquids onto airplanes.
Not medicines, not creams, not drinks, not nothing. Untold hundreds of
thousands of airline passengers immediately and indefinitely lost the right
to carry liquids or pastes on themselves or in their carry-on luggage.
Which is stupid.
Because Gatorade's not the problem, Muslims are the problem.
Can we be honest enough to just admit that for a minute? The plotters
uncovered in England were all Muslims. They all had Muslim names. They all
but one or two were of Pakistani descent. They were motivated by religious
bigotry. They wanted to kill because they were Muslim and they wanted to
kill the people they wanted to kill because they weren't Muslim.
Yet political correctness forbids us from mentioning that, much less acting
upon it.
In fact, on the ABC network news over the weekend, the plotters were called
"British Extremists" - as if somehow the fact they were in Great Britain
was defining of their extremism. The fact is they were Muslim extremists,
but the American media is so in bed with the diversity-training crowd that
fact can't be mentioned.
Also on American newscasts over the weekend, the story was told of three
men buying thousands of disposable and untraceable cell phones, an activity
with possible terrorist linkages. Not surprisingly, very few accounts noted
that the men were Muslims with Muslim names.
Political correctness has sanitized this fight to such an extent that we
are not allowed to even identify the enemy.
Which is not toothpaste, it is Islam.
Islam is practiced by tens of millions of people around the world and which
repeatedly and consistently puts armies and cells of terrorists in action
around the world. No doubt there are peace-loving Muslims, it's just that
they have an amazing capacity for keeping a low profile - or demanding that
people respect their religion.
Our desire not to offend Muslims and their culture stands great potential
to cost American lives. Countless American lives.
Here's what I mean.
Let's lay aside political correctness for a moment and use scientific
analysis. Let's use reason and logic for just a minute.
For example: How many terrorist acts have been committed involving liquids
carried onto airplanes by passengers?
Answer: Zero.
Second question: How many terrorist acts involving airliners have been
committed by Muslims?
Answer: All of them.
Third question: Why are we focused on liquids instead of Muslims?
Answer: Beats me.
Why is it that the protection of our airline industry is focused on
products, not people? Why is it that we go to such extreme lengths to
screen materials, but purposely avoid screening the people who carry them?
Wouldn't we be safer if we focused our security efforts largely on Muslim
passengers? Especially young, male Muslim passengers? Isn't the fact that
every single act of airliner terrorism involved a young, male Muslim
relevant?
Does it make sense to take away a mother's bottle of Children's Tylenol and
a grandmother's bottle of Coke while at the same time purposely not
profiling likely terrorists?
Can't we be honest enough to admit that profiling potential terrorists by
religion, national origin, gender and age is a good idea? Aren't we bright
enough to understand that asking a few extra questions of a young Muslim
airline passenger is not the same as pulling over a black man just because
he's driving in a "white" neighborhood?
A group of people was arrested last week for plotting a terrorist attack.
They were young Muslim men. Just like the group before that and the group
before that and the group before that. And the group before that.
So, naturally, you can't take Chapstick on an airplane.
Toiletries don't commit acts of terrorism.
Muslims do.
Maybe if the government spent less time looking at your carry-on bag and
more time looking at young male Muslim passengers we'd all be a lot safer
and a lot less inconvenienced.
This isn't about Gatorade, this is about jihad. It's time to stop focusing
on products and start focusing on people. People who happen to be Muslim.
durka durka? baka durka jihad abdul?
j/k hi rob
There you go using the "M" word again. Your going to piss off alot of people like that.
GATORADE IS NOT THE PROBLEM!
Toiletries don't commit acts of terrorism, Muslims do...
So why can't I take my toothpaste on the plane? How is it that Gatorade is
forbidden? Why can't I have a bottle of water?
Because we aren't really fighting a war with terror, we are losing a
struggle with political correctness. It is not so much the evil of
outsiders, it is the cowardice of politically correct Americans and
politically correct American politicians.
The cowardice that won't let us call a spade a spade, the makes us all live
in an alternate reality, that puts survival secondary to servility. We are
fighting World War III with one arm tied behind our back.
Last week was a good example.
A group of two or three dozen Muslims in England and Pakistan plotted to
blow up 10 or 12 passenger-laden airliners in transatlantic flight. The
purpose was to celebrate and reprise the attacks of September 11. The means
was the detonation of explosive liquids disguised as common liquids - like
Gatorade or shampoo.
The plot was discovered, followed and - hopefully - foiled by British
intelligence with an assist from Americans and Pakistanis. Immediately, new
restrictions were put on airline passengers. Because the plotters planned
to use liquids, passengers were forbidden to bring liquids onto airplanes.
Not medicines, not creams, not drinks, not nothing. Untold hundreds of
thousands of airline passengers immediately and indefinitely lost the right
to carry liquids or pastes on themselves or in their carry-on luggage.
Which is stupid.
Because Gatorade's not the problem, Muslims are the problem.
Can we be honest enough to just admit that for a minute? The plotters
uncovered in England were all Muslims. They all had Muslim names. They all
but one or two were of Pakistani descent. They were motivated by religious
bigotry. They wanted to kill because they were Muslim and they wanted to
kill the people they wanted to kill because they weren't Muslim.
Yet political correctness forbids us from mentioning that, much less acting
upon it.
In fact, on the ABC network news over the weekend, the plotters were called
"British Extremists" - as if somehow the fact they were in Great Britain
was defining of their extremism. The fact is they were Muslim extremists,
but the American media is so in bed with the diversity-training crowd that
fact can't be mentioned.
Also on American newscasts over the weekend, the story was told of three
men buying thousands of disposable and untraceable cell phones, an activity
with possible terrorist linkages. Not surprisingly, very few accounts noted
that the men were Muslims with Muslim names.
Political correctness has sanitized this fight to such an extent that we
are not allowed to even identify the enemy.
Which is not toothpaste, it is Islam.
Islam is practiced by tens of millions of people around the world and which
repeatedly and consistently puts armies and cells of terrorists in action
around the world. No doubt there are peace-loving Muslims, it's just that
they have an amazing capacity for keeping a low profile - or demanding that
people respect their religion.
Our desire not to offend Muslims and their culture stands great potential
to cost American lives. Countless American lives.
Here's what I mean.
Let's lay aside political correctness for a moment and use scientific
analysis. Let's use reason and logic for just a minute.
For example: How many terrorist acts have been committed involving liquids
carried onto airplanes by passengers?
Answer: Zero.
Second question: How many terrorist acts involving airliners have been
committed by Muslims?
Answer: All of them.
Third question: Why are we focused on liquids instead of Muslims?
Answer: Beats me.
Why is it that the protection of our airline industry is focused on
products, not people? Why is it that we go to such extreme lengths to
screen materials, but purposely avoid screening the people who carry them?
Wouldn't we be safer if we focused our security efforts largely on Muslim
passengers? Especially young, male Muslim passengers? Isn't the fact that
every single act of airliner terrorism involved a young, male Muslim
relevant?
Does it make sense to take away a mother's bottle of Children's Tylenol and
a grandmother's bottle of Coke while at the same time purposely not
profiling likely terrorists?
Can't we be honest enough to admit that profiling potential terrorists by
religion, national origin, gender and age is a good idea? Aren't we bright
enough to understand that asking a few extra questions of a young Muslim
airline passenger is not the same as pulling over a black man just because
he's driving in a "white" neighborhood?
A group of people was arrested last week for plotting a terrorist attack.
They were young Muslim men. Just like the group before that and the group
before that and the group before that. And the group before that.
So, naturally, you can't take Chapstick on an airplane.
Toiletries don't commit acts of terrorism.
Muslims do.
Maybe if the government spent less time looking at your carry-on bag and
more time looking at young male Muslim passengers we'd all be a lot safer
and a lot less inconvenienced.
This isn't about Gatorade, this is about jihad. It's time to stop focusing
on products and start focusing on people. People who happen to be Muslim.
"RIGHT F_ _ KING ON"
How would you go about separating the "good" muslums from the bad? Would you just say that anyone that looks Middle Eastern can't fly or would you just prohibit those that have Middle Eastern type names from flying?
I agree!!!
How would you go about separating the "good" muslums from the bad?
that's a rhetorical question, right?
Great post. I agree 99%. Where does my 1% fall?? How do you then stop someone of the likes of Timothy McVeigh?
that's a rhetorical question, right?
No really, wondering. I ask because I have a brother in law who was born in Jordan. He looks like a terrorist (no facial hair though). Aside from his last name he would fit the criteria of never being able to fly again. He is by all means American. He's lived in America since the age of 12. Just wondering how to filter out the bad while at the same time keeping the good.
No really, wondering. I ask because I have a brother in law who was born in Jordan. He looks like a terrorist (no facial hair though). Aside from his last name he would fit the criteria of never being able to fly again. He is by all means American. He's lived in America since the age of 12. Just wondering how to filter out the bad while at the same time keeping the good.
He won't be able to bring toothpaste and gatorade on planes
Posting Permissions