I'm finding several cams that are close to something I want but I don't feel confident with them. I called Comp about their marine grinds and told them about my concern of reversion with too much overlap and the tech said its ramp speed that causes reversion, not overlap. I gently set the phone down and ran out of my garage crying.
So anyway, I started fooling around with some cams and I have some general overlap questions. Forgive me, but I only have overlap numbers @ .050"
A stock flat tappet chevy Mercruiser cam specs out to about 202/213 on a 110 LSA. That makes -12.5* of overlap, and since its the stock cam I assume that is adequate. I have a Vortec block so I'll be doing a roller, but I'm just speaking of overlap right now. Comp does a 212/218 roller on a 112 LSA that specs out with -9* overlap. A little more, but they don't seem to think that reversion is an issue.
So, as long as I'm not increasing overlap, the LSA is not a factor in reversion, right? I'm looking at two grinds that I concocted myself: a 204/214 on 110 (which makes -11*) and a 200/210 on 108 (which also makes -11*).
The reason I ask is that on the simulation, a 200/210 on 108 retarded 4* makes the exact same power with a bit more torque than the 212/218 on 112, and has a little less overlap despite its 108* LSA.
The real question is... I assume the main factor in reversion is overlap regardless of other events, right? So if I am reducing duration along with LSA and keeping the same overlap, am I still OK?
Dyno sims attached showing a 212/218-112 installed straight up and a 200/210-108 installed 4* retarded. Same basic curves, 12* less duration. Sounds like a winner. Thoughts?
How is it that overlap doesn't cause reversion? If the exhaust valve is still open when the piston is on its way down on the intake stroke, you can bet there will in fact be reversion in the works.