WRONG! The vast majority of CLIMATOLOGISTS say it is a natural trend, that has historically shown a roughly 25 year cycle. Cooler, to warmer, to cooler again.
After WWII, for the 50's, 60's, and 70's, global hydrocarbon use SOARED.
Global COx emissions SOARED.
The earth continued to COOL, so much that idiot scientists called a "Global Cooling Crisis", and announced mankind was bringing on the next ice age early.
Finally, in the later 70's, the trend REVERSED ITSELF.
CLIMATOLOGICAL SCIENTISTS are noting this in saying AGW is a crock.
CLIMATOLOGICAL scientists who are named in the UN report, who disagree with the report, who have nothing in the report, are UNABLE TO GET THEIR NAMES REMOVED AFROM THE REPORT, untill they sue anyhow.
WHERE???????
The INACCURATE AND UN-FACTUAL information in Algore's film?
Obviously, yet you are convinced.
At what expense?
Yet again, WHAT CHANGE IS CAUSED BY 0.0027%
Zero point zero, zero, two, seven, percent.
Twenty-seven-ten-thousandths of ONE PERCENT, IF we CLOSE the entire US emmissions today.
"And I WILL NOT BE convinced otherwise!"
What an overblown view of Humans and our capability.
Reasons you cannot seem to diferentiate from the AGW/MMGW reasons.
No-one argues polution to be bad, yet, we polute LESS NOW than we ever used to in your youth, with FAR MORE ENERGY USAGE.
Sounds like Al-Gore and his "Carbon Offsets".
" I can have a couple mansions, and fly on private jets, and sponsor huge concerts that generate trash and use energy, if I pay someone else to not use over here."
I comment that there is significant evidence that the issue isn't made made and I'm wrong? Do you squirt when you mention Al Gore, cause you sure so talk about him alot. Such a long winded response to a comment about common sense.
Do you have a hangover again this morning weekend boy?