So explain to me the difference between erring on the side of caution for a completely unproven hypothesis and erring on the side of caution for an absolute fact?
http://www.prostate.com/prostatecancer/
If you have been diagnosed with prostate cancer, you are not alone. During his lifetime, a man has about a 1 in 10 chance of being diagnosed with prostate cancer. Over 200,000 new cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed annually in the U.S.
What absolute fact are you referring to?
My father lived to be 80 and had no prostate problems.
Next
http://www.prostate.com/prostatecancer/
If you have been diagnosed with prostate cancer, you are not alone. During his lifetime, a man has about a 1 in 10 chance of being diagnosed with prostate cancer. Over 200,000 new cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed annually in the U.S.
What absolute fact are you referring to?
My father lived to be 80 and had no prostate problems.
Next
Oh, I'm sorry. So you don't have a prostate gland?
So you can't err on the side of caution.
That explains a lot.
Oh, I'm sorry. So you don't have a prostate gland?
So you can't err on the side of caution.
That explains a lot.
That's what I said????? You're beginning to sound as lame as Miller.
Seems kind of gay that you are so interested in my prostate.
That's what I said????? You're beginning to sound as lame as Miller.
Seems kind of gay that you are so interested in my prostate.
OOH, the lefty hypocrite called me lame....I'm gonna cry!
That's what I said????? You're beginning to sound as lame as Miller.
Seems kind of gay that you are so interested in my prostate.
Liberals, what a joke.
Let me explain it for you, you're a little denser than usual today.
Your statement of that "common sense dictates we err on the side of caution" regarding global warming is just as stupid, actually more stupid, than having ones prostate removed on the side of caution. Now are you ready for this? It's pretty simple except for a lib, especially since there is no guarentee that you will get prostate cancer.
Who here wants to bet that Ultra still doesn't understand my point?
Liberals, what a joke.
Let me explain it for you, you're a little denser than usual today.
Your statement of that "common sense dictates we err on the side of caution" regarding global warming is just as stupid, actually more stupid, than having ones prostate removed on the side of caution. Now are you ready for this? It's pretty simple except for a lib, especially since there is no guarentee that you will get prostate cancer.
Who here wants to bet that Ultra still doesn't understand my point?
Your point was lame in the 1st place and continues to be lame. I save money and use less fuel with my daily driving. Less emissions too. That's enough reason for me. It's not hard, really.
Also, have we coined a new word in "denser"
Your point was lame in the 1st place and continues to be lame. I save money and use less fuel with my daily driving. Less emissions too. That's enough reason for me. It's not hard, really.
Also, have we coined a new word in "denser"
My analogy to your idiotic statement is much more valid than your complete inability to defend your statement.
You need to fact check a little deeper too Mr. Investimagator, 80% of all eighty year old males in the US have or have had prostate cancer. If a man lives long enough it's guarenteed.
Denser is also in the dictionary spell check boy.
Investigator???? No wonder my insurance is so high.
Actually you both (Shiada and Ultra) are making sense in your last posts here. On the micro level, Ultra's choosing to have a civic as a daily driver and doing other personal things to save energy and $$ makes perfect sense. Shiada's "cut out your prostate" analogy is a good one for looking at the macro, re those who would consider using government to force costly and poorly conceived measures, like Kyoto, on us all in order to "play it safe".
My analogy to your idiotic statement is much more valid than your complete inability to defend your statement.
You need to fact check a little deeper too Mr. Investimagator, 80% of all eighty year old males in the US have or have had prostate cancer. If a man lives long enough it's guarenteed.
Denser is also in the dictionary spell check boy.
Investigator???? No wonder my insurance is so high.
Which is it??
It's pretty simple except for a lib, especially since there is no guarentee that you will get prostate cancer.
[I]80% of all eighty year old males in the US have or have had prostate cancer
Please follow the link to PROSTATE.COM 1 in 10 get prostate cancer
http://www.prostate.com/prostatecancer/
Which is it??
Please follow the link to PROSTATE.COM 1 in 10 get prostate cancer
http://www.prostate.com/prostatecancer/
Not that live to eighty.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote