I agree!
Why is it that the libs have a very narrow view of the scope of the 2nd amendment, yet want to interpret the 1st amendment in the absolute broadest terms.
I have no problem with people wanting to exercise their second amendment right to bear arms as members of a well regulated militia...what's your point? Go ahead, go join a well regulated militia.
Like all other areas of the Constitution, the second amendment is subject to revision. People have been trying for YEARS (and show no signs of letting up) to modify a woman's right to privacy based on their religious beliefs, and the entire Republican party strategy for a couple decades has been based on promising their base that they'll repeal that right, so what makes you think that modifying or eliminating the second amendment is or should be off the table?
Folks REALLY need to stop hiding behind the Constitution, because the mere fact that it was written on some paper 220ish years ago by some dead white slave owners doesn't make it the inspired word of the almighty. If your entire argument is that "...hey, it's in the Constitution" then your argument is pretty weak.
Homeless