Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: California Propositions (Caution Political Thread)

  1. #11
    Essex502
    Simple:
    Prop 55 - NO - we can't afford it at this time.
    Prop 56 - NO - we can't afford it EVER!
    Prop 57 - YES - we can't afford NOT to.
    Prop 58 - YES - Yes, Yes, YES! We must have balanced budgets and quit spending money we don't have!

  2. #12
    eliminatedsprinter
    Originally posted by Essex502
    Simple:
    Prop 55 - NO - we can't afford it at this time.
    Prop 56 - NO - we can't afford it EVER!
    Prop 57 - YES - we can't afford NOT to.
    Prop 58 - YES - Yes, Yes, YES! We must have balanced budgets and quit spending money we don't have!
    I agree, however 57 is not as cut and dry as the others and I can understand how many smart people would still oppose it. 58 only goes into effect if 57 passes and it's really very weak. I'm leaning twards voting for 57 and 58 but I think both have major flaws and I don't see much good coming from them.
    Of course 55 is a definate no and 56 is just plain rotten.:devil: :burningm:

  3. #13
    058
    57 and 58 are bullshit deals too....Why can't they just stop spending money they don't have? They created this crisis so they can get us out of this crisis without more money from bonds or taxes. We go without when we don't have the money, why can't they do the same?

  4. #14
    CrazyHippy
    Ahhh Nevada
    BJH

  5. #15
    eliminatedsprinter
    Originally posted by CrazyHippy
    Ahhh Nevada
    BJH
    Go ahead, rub it in. Ya weedwacker sellin bast@*$...:wink:

  6. #16
    Essex502
    Originally posted by eliminatedsprinter
    I agree, however 57 is not as cut and dry as the others and I can understand how many smart people would still oppose it. 58 only goes into effect if 57 passes and it's really very weak. I'm leaning twards voting for 57 and 58 but I think both have major flaws and I don't see much good coming from them.
    Of course 55 is a definate no and 56 is just plain rotten.:devil: :burningm:
    Prop 57 restructures the current debt to allow the state time to pay it back without going bankrupt. It's not about borrowing more more to spend on new follies but to restructure debt sorta' like taking a home equity loan to pay off your credit card bills before YOU go bankrupt. I don't think we have much choice in whether or not to do it as it needs to be done.
    Prop 58 makes balanced budgets a requirement each year.
    See this (http://www.theksbwchannel.com/ksbw/2846178/detail.html)

  7. #17
    CA Stu
    Vote Yes on Proposition No
    Thanks
    CA Stu

  8. #18
    LUVNLIFE
    YES,,,,you know what I mean.

  9. #19
    eliminatedsprinter
    Originally posted by LUVNLIFE
    YES,,,,you know what I mean.
    Vote yes on prop, er, position 69.

  10. #20
    HalletDave
    Originally posted by eliminatedsprinter
    Vote yes on prop, er, position 69.
    Oh yeah.
    Summers Eve is some tasty shit but you don't want to go to work with your breath smelling like a freshly douched hey hey.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Cute Monday Funny (caution...political)
    By MsDrmr in forum Sandbar
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-16-2006, 01:26 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-02-2004, 05:22 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-02-2004, 09:30 AM
  4. Yep another political thread
    By spectratoad in forum Sandbar
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 08-30-2004, 12:24 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-10-2004, 11:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •